I see some drawbacks of the Lulu model in comparison to using a traditional publisher:
- The quality of the printed product is not up to the usual book standards.
- No salespeople are pushing the book across the country and around the world.
- Publishers frequently arrange for reviewers to read and correct texts.
- Publishers' sales forces can gather feedback useful in content creation.
- Publishers offer technical help including indexing, formatting, art work, etc.
I am thinking through ways of overcoming these drawbacks, while enjoying the benefits of the Lulu model. These are:
- The author can keep the price low for the book, thus benefiting students.
- In spite of the above point, the author can earn more per sale than is traditional.
- The author can revise the text on any schedule, thus adding to flexibility.
I am not sure how this will come out, but so far I am quite impressed with Lulu.
No comments:
Post a Comment